tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3332119306511101304.post500348245947598838..comments2023-04-30T09:19:10.570-04:00Comments on Living With the Dead: Secondary InfectionJoshua Guesshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09757886577340365451noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3332119306511101304.post-78846621078942068792012-07-04T03:12:44.343-04:002012-07-04T03:12:44.343-04:00It's not that heartless to view the statistics...It's not that heartless to view the statistics of human loss due to this new strain. It's actually a way to monitor if this new strain is evolving in the future, ie an increase in infection and fatality. Talking numbers does not make a heartless approach..it's a concern that is highly viable due to means of defense as well as whether quarantine may need to be a factor in the future as well as finding new means for the people going out there to defend themselves from this strain. Heartless would be saying, "Oh good..more food for everyone else":Independently Crazy:https://www.blogger.com/profile/17179862625960130549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3332119306511101304.post-40129682889975888222012-05-11T21:40:56.193-04:002012-05-11T21:40:56.193-04:00It's too bad you aren't in contact with an...It's too bad you aren't in contact with anyone that worked in a germ warfare lab in a previous life, one could imagine the potential of two competing strains as a weapon against the undead. Risky given the human implication... But refined, honed, and focused towards some B-movie rejects? Now there's a thought.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3332119306511101304.post-33529060397245276362012-05-11T13:58:06.780-04:002012-05-11T13:58:06.780-04:00The entire point is sustainability. When I'm t...The entire point is sustainability. When I'm talking numbers here, I'm hoping that we don't face the devastating loss of half our population. I'm not sure how you see hoping one in two people don't die is a negative. Don't think for a second I haven't thought about losing someone I love to this, nor should you think that I'm happy about the idea we'd lose even one person. But when push comes to shove, it's a matter of sustainability. Period. New Haven can't survive with so few people. <br /><br />I'm going to post about this tomorrow.Joshua Guesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09757886577340365451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3332119306511101304.post-57812557356728852582012-05-11T12:23:03.773-04:002012-05-11T12:23:03.773-04:00There you go talking numbers again. Is it always ...There you go talking numbers again. Is it always only about survival? You talk about the lose of people as numbers, which I understand maybe your way of helping you cope. But will you feel the same way if one of the 5% potential lost is your wife, Pat's nieces, Will, your entire medical staff or you?<br /><br />It seems to me that New Haven focuses on defense and food, which should be a focus for obvious reasons. What is the longtime focus? Survivability is a good skill to teach, but what about sustainability?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com